Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 23 days ago, 11 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221121
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '24 at 13:03
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	42% Average	Memory 24.9 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 212 54% 110 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 337 45% 338 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630 933 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Nvidia(10DE 1F83) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.7% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 28.8 28% 30.9 fps	MRender 31.5 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 29.1 24% 30 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 1836 1871 1960 1984 2048 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 1,825 Write 1,618 Mixed 1,770 SusWrite 1,910 402% 1,781 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 66.3 199% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,018 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 810 605% 814 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 22 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 14.8 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	165	23.8"	1280 720	HKC2496 24E4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	440x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	331x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	217x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	258x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	155x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	123x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	68x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	146x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	75x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $469

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16