HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8574
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '24 at 07:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 667
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 92.3
74% 93.9 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 82.8
Splatting 82.8
78% 97.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,627
Write 1,277
Mixed 1,176
302% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 57.7
186% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 511
439% 653 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 163 162 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 132
Mixed 72
SusWrite 164
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 90%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05C0
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback