Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230916
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 344
104% 199 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 826
84% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb NVME EVM 512GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 156 156 128 77 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 234
Write 148
Mixed 142
SusWrite 121
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 7
57% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.6
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 74.2
63% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 50.6
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 125%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 0" 1463 843
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback