MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '24 at 14:57
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 28 1-Core 112 2-Core 217 59% 119 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 424 55% 413 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	9.68% Terrible	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 19.1 10% 14.2 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 13 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.68% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 161 246 4.4 4.2 4.1 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 212 Write 125 Mixed 218 SusWrite 79.9 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 22.2 4K Mixed 4.4 31% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 34.6 65% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 92%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 286% 703GB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 1737 2080 1770 1871 2100 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,539 Write 2,001 Mixed 1,616 SusWrite 1876 398% 1,758 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 53.2 169% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 696 DQ Write 586 DQ Mixed 627 473% 636 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 441%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 1x8GB 784 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	75	27"	1280 720	ACR079F QG271

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	322x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	302x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	222x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	199x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	129x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	51x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	68x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16