Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '24 at 21:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700-$376
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 224
2-Core 447
128% 250 Pts
4-Core 891
8-Core 1,779
157% 1,335 Pts
64-Core 3,471
215% 3,471 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 123%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.67% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.7
8% 12.5 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 0
6% 9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1565 1654 1730 1726 1726 1163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1,954
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,375
SusWrite 1,594
366% 1,629 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 43.4
241% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 1,282
DQ Mixed 590
571% 882 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 292%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-32 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2269 2269WM
Typical GA-B760M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback