Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 80.1 29% 51 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 195 20% 161 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5069) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 6.1 5% 5.2 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 7.9 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB 10,890 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1L2QEXD7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 618 Write 574 Mixed 568 131% 586 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 15.4 52% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 88.1 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 104 77% 100 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 247%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 97GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 67 67 68 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 102 Write 79 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 67.1 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.8 184% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB 16,227 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.3 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	13.9"	1280 720	LEN40A9

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	1x

RAM
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16