To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '24 at 18:18
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2440 0 170 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 146 59% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 424 44% 353 Pts	64-Core 526 32% 526 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1546) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 49.8 46% 54.7 fps	MRender 42.8 Gravity 51.2 Splatting 46.7 38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X04c26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 223 226 225 225 225 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.3% Above average	Read 250 Write 225 Mixed 214 SusWrite 225 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 21.8 72% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 177 129% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 258GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 16 18 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 153 Write 16.7 Mixed 17 SusWrite 16.7 37% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	14%	69	213	57	75	19.1"	1440 847	LEN1152 L197 Wide

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	724x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	282x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	269x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16