HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '24 at 14:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 163 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 324 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 430 1,924 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Dell(1028 1002) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	5.06% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 8.6 5% 7.67 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 6.1 5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.06% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD GREEN 128GB SSD 22 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2209XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 37 41 39 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.9% Below average	Read 229 Write 96 Mixed 137 SusWrite 41.5 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 26 73% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.2 DQ Write 81.8 DQ Mixed 103 72% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 74%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 306GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 150 146 149 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 146 Write 141 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 150 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.6% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 4.2 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	15	75	18.9"	1280 720	DELA03C DELL 1909W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	685x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	593x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16