MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20240329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '24 at 21:48
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 84.1 1-Core 141 2-Core 278 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 906 89% 727 Pts	64-Core 1,102 68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.6% Poor	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 38.2 30% 38.4 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 27.1 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB 3,599 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 393 150 391 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 481 Write 433 Mixed 378 SusWrite 251 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 27.8 94% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 162 133% 190 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 114%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 948GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 437 441 455 459 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 439 Mixed 400 SusWrite 442 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 45.3 152% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 201 151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 122%
Adata SC610 2TB 498GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 341 325 340 337 342 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.8% Very good	Read 346 Write 365 Mixed 339 SusWrite 338 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 26.6 102% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 183 138% 186 MB/s

Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 583GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 434 437 441 455 459 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 448 Mixed 398 SusWrite 442 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 43.2 140% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 201 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 121%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 537GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 435 437 442 455 459 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 447 Mixed 425 SusWrite 442 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 49.3 163% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 201 151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 270GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 122 121 123 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 124 Write 91.8 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 123 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 112%
WD My Passport 0827 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 677GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 101 Write 98.2 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 90 129% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 37.5 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 38.5 84% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	100	31.5"	1280 720	LHC3200 C32QW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,734x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,603x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,386x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,080x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	747x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	522x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	618x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	517x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	264x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	344x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	179x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,412

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16