Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	33.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '24 at 15:54
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Memory 73 1-Core 179 2-Core 345 104% 199 Pts	4-Core 672 8-Core 1,184 112% 928 Pts	64-Core 1,663 103% 1,663 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 130 Parallax 128 114% 133 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 102 Splatting 98.4 91% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$104 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 1630 1619 1506 1325 1370 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	347% Outstanding	Read 2,620 Write 2,430 Mixed 1,912 SusWrite 1,512 475% 2,118 MB/s	4K Read 65.7 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 92.7 311% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,310 DQ Write 1,068 DQ Mixed 1,168 880% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 347% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 465GB free Firmware: KC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 125 126 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 120 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 125 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 88%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 123 119 123 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 124 Mixed 86.4 SusWrite 121 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 924GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 133 132 133 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 139 Write 123 Mixed 87.9 SusWrite 132 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 48GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.8% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 21.5 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 22.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	17%	58	216	58	60	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

History: Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B | Score 33: 0P 2R 4G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $817

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 33: 0P 2R 4G 11B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)