Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 11:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 187
2-Core 365
111% 211 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,178
112% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,635
101% 1,635 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Palit(1569 F308) ≥ 4GB; RTX 4060 Ti Palit
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 197
Parallax 217
173% 209 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 171
Splatting 127
156% 201 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 154%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax PCIe SSD 1TB
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFMC0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,337
Write 2,478
Mixed 1,686
414% 1,834 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 92.6
315% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,612
DQ Write 1128
DQ Mixed 1,295
987% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D12.2755SS.001 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 37.5
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 29.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 2G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 23% 60 216 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback