Micro Venus Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro Venus Series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory50.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231120
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 01:34
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 36.6
1-Core 200
2-Core 395
102% 210 Pts
4-Core 786
8-Core 1,308
128% 1,047 Pts
64-Core 1,801
111% 1,801 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1F4C B002) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 89.4
48% 57.9 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 100
58% 66.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR01TBTLCZ-27J-2 1TB
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2186 2258 959 739 741 743 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 2,066
Mixed 1,642
SusWrite 1,271
366% 1,615 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 54.8
174% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 869
546% 623 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 214%
Great: 325%
Best Buy NS-PC25HDE(-C) 500GB
182GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 467 468 467 432 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 459
Mixed 443
SusWrite 429
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 40.6
131% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 262
199% 271 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BD8HA-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 50.6
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 19.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 216
19% 216 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 116%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 690 530 144 31.5" 1280 720 DELD110 DELL S3222DGM
Typical Venus Series Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Micro Venus Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback