Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 165% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 143% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210306
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '24 at 01:01
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$206 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 135 2-Core 271 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 723 73% 595 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550 45,585 User benchmarks, average bench 190% Asus(1043 895A) ≥ 4GB; ASUS Dual Overclocked CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	194% Outstanding	Lighting 271 Reflection 399 Parallax 284 220% 318 fps	MRender 371 Gravity 241 Splatting 192 210% 268 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 205%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 570GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 716 2372 3074 3185 2371 1425 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	403% Outstanding	Read 2780 Write 2,806 Mixed 2,970 SusWrite 2,190 606% 2,687 MB/s	4K Read 73.9 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 102 330% 114 MB/s	DQ Read 1,364 DQ Write 1,089 DQ Mixed 1,206 908% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 403% Great: 526%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 602GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 2052 2053 1922 1485 1443 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	326% Outstanding	Read 2,161 Write 1942 Mixed 1,084 SusWrite 1794 391% 1,745 MB/s	4K Read 52 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 74.3 256% 93.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,287 DQ Write 1,023 DQ Mixed 1,101 839% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 326% Great: 354%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 803GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 467 467 467 467 467 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 462 Mixed 428 SusWrite 461 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 53.8 178% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 817GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 467 467 467 467 467 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 464 Mixed 429 SusWrite 467 106% 469 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 53.2 177% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 128%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 182 181 180 182 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 143 Write 147 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 181 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 130%
Toshiba HDWR480 8TB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 219 213 213 216 214 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 212 Mixed 118 SusWrite 212 134% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 39 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 38.5 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	49	60	36.1"	1280 720	TCL0000 TCL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,661x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,289x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,428x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,247x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,084x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,473x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,841x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	868x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	729x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,015

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16