| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Cyberpowerpc C SERIES (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASRock B360M Xtreme |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190508 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '24 at 21:58 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
68% 538 Pts
|
40% 641 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
|
71.4%
Very good
|
76% 89.7 fps
|
62% 75.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
83% 372 MB/s
|
55% 16.8 MB/s
|
28% 40.2 MB/s
| |
|
Jmicron Generic 1TB
23GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 213 147 64 67 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
30% 135 MB/s
|
47% 16.7 MB/s
|
57% 83.6 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
145GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 16 15 20 27 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
21% 29.1 MB/s
|
43% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.2%
Good
|
67% 23.4 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
60% 66.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% | 5% | 20 | 215 | 59 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | HKC2711 27E1QA |
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,323x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 682x |
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 356x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 1,306x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 534x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 326x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $272 |