Asus M32CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 21:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 162
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 293
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8678) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 36.9
31% 38.9 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 33.2
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 4.8 6.6 6.2 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
464GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 101 104 114 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 112
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
930GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 153 156 176 181 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 188
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 168
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
238GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 113 115 127 131 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 124
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1MNG/8G 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 45 75 0" 1280 720 27V2G5
Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback