HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D2
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230822
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 18.6
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 110
34% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 174
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 87D2) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.02.06
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 78 90 100 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 49.2
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 77.9
38% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 275
15% 275 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO80EC
Typical Laptop 15s-gr0xxx Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-gr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback