HP EliteDesk 800 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8594
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 10:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 681
72% 576 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8594) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.8
4% 7.37 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 14.2
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv512g KIOXIA 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA5101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 784 808 798 701 688 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 1,809
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 834
326% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 42.6
160% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 613
457% 610 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 197%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 11 60 23" 1920 1009 DELF04D DELL E2314H
Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback