Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '24 at 08:00
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 274 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 905 88% 724 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 871A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.4% Below average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 58.6 Parallax 49.2 45% 54.4 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 50 Splatting 46.6 28% 32.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 151 6.3 74 73 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 497 Write 384 Mixed 385 SusWrite 106 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.4 31% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 95 96 94 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 137 Write 147 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 94.6 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FN 1x16GB 152 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 14.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.4 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	27	60	31.5"	1280 720	LEN66DF L32p-30

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	603x
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	234x
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	246x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	181x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	152x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	128x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	82x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	46x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	54x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16