Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	10.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '24 at 05:45
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 65.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 225 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 701 70% 570 Pts	64-Core 1,125 70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% MSI(1462 5102) CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	208% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 299 Parallax 798 168% 434 fps	MRender 523 Gravity 565 Splatting 298 362% 462 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 407%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,348 Write 2,287 Mixed 2175 507% 2,270 MB/s	4K Read 58.8 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 71.1 231% 75 MB/s	DQ Read 879 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 717 529% 704 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 960 EVO 500G 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 128GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 364 Write 658 Mixed 407 107% 476 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 30.9 104% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 97.4 77% 106 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 73%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB 8,393 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 126GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 496 Write 456 Mixed 397 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 281 217% 293 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB 8,393 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 156GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 489 Write 456 Mixed 399 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 40 133% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 278 212% 282 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 31GB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 101 Write 85.9 Mixed 57.1 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 93% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB 6,222 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	23"	1920 1080	ENC2348 CS230

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,062

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)