Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '24 at 20:32
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 788 74% 614 Pts	64-Core 808 50% 808 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 865F) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 174 Parallax 158 136% 166 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 146 Splatting 126 122% 153 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,021 Write 1,957 Mixed 1,384 398% 1,787 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 57 188% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 911 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 820 603% 796 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 168 166 169 168 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 183 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 161 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 13,788 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 20.6 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 20.4 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0F9D C27R50x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,452x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,375x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,800x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,213x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,174x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	920x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,030x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	796x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	633x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	501x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	491x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	438x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,074

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16