Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '24 at 19:55
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 59.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 75% 141 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 411 50% 381 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 400A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 4.9 4% 5.23 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR054 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 405 286 129 136 95 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 454 Write 352 Mixed 62.9 SusWrite 241 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 7 50% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 24.9 71% 148 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 365GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 97 98 96 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 96 59% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8ET 1x8GB 1,105 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 8.1 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	17%	18	80	12	60	20"	1600 837	LEN114A LEN L2060wA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,316x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,164x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	137x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	576x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	310x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	267x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	182x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	135x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	127x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	93x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	82x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16