Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 18:01
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$182
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 197
2-Core 359
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,106
109% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 13.3
6% 11.2 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 20.9
11% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2115 2111 2119 571 273 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,671
Write 2,316
Mixed 1,964
SusWrite 1,252
407% 1,801 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 59.7
210% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 1,538
DQ Mixed 1,214
962% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 269%
Great: 394%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
328GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 90 91 89 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50% Average
Read 84
Write 87.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 90.4
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD0 500GB
455GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 114
124% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 44%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 27 33 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 163
Write 39.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 32.7
72% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
136% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 25.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 ACR0804 ED270R P
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 273%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback