PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7A65 |
Motherboard | MSI B250M GAMING PRO (MS-7A65) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170206 |
Uptime | 2.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 11 '24 at 13:39 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.9%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
697GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 374 354 365 366 367 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hs-ssd-e2000 256G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 42A7T25A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 994 929 953 261 263 MB/s
|
229%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
473GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 91 105 111 108 119 MB/s
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 8% | 39 | 44 | 9 | 60 | 28.8" | 2048 801 | GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 356x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 311x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 235x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 286x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 269x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 142x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |