HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 07:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 65.8
36% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 69.6
8-Core 72.3
9% 70.9 Pts
64-Core 68.9
4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.7
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 34 119 121 110 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 313
Write 181
Mixed 134
SusWrite 84.1
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 8.6
44% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 42
39% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
624GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 84 76 82 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 84.2
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 79.7
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 12GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback