Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '24 at 03:43
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 178 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 316 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 81.8 53% 68.9 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 42.9 47% 59.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 245GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 234 57 55 55 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1,217 Write 669 Mixed 773 SusWrite 203 158% 716 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 52.1 172% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 220 225% 359 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Kingston KM0VW4-MID 16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	57	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0D32 C27F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	395x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	387x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	356x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	403x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	350x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	218x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	117x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	70x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	61x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	55x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16