Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory40.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 23:55
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
93% 170 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,036
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 203
Parallax 235
168% 215 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 212
Splatting 169
171% 215 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 737 810 824 824 826 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,511
Write 1,698
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 840
298% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 66.8
222% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,551
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1,294
981% 1,328 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 241%
Great: 274%
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 211070WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 839 829 835 836 835 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,820
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 949
307% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 65.5
226% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,643
DQ Write 1,255
DQ Mixed 1420
1,070% 1,439 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 248%
Great: 274%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 1214 1320 1329 1369 1353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,444
Write 1447
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 1,322
298% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.8
244% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 272
358% 634 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 251%
Great: 295%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 94 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 95.8
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 92.8
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN345C HP E223
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback