Casper NIRVANA NB C600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB C600  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C600 001
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220909
Uptime25.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 51.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 265
79% 152 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 536
62% 484 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 22.6
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 922 683 776 709 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 727
229% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 51.1
170% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 542
379% 487 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1538
Typical NIRVANA NB C600 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Casper NIRVANA NB C600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback