PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds) |
Memory | 16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130819 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 10 '24 at 14:14 |
Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 76 77 84 73 80 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$45
18GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 68 85 75 83 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
|||
BT58SSD12M 512GB
251GB free
Firmware: HPS2272P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 74 83 56 9.5 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 93 91 82 92 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
576GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 11 9.5 11 MB/s
|
||||
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
2TB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
64.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 713 | 169 | 60 | 24.5" | 1280 720 | IVM6136 PL2592H |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 331x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 188x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 60x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 45x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $1,364 |