Puget Workstation Threadripper TRX50 T120-L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics289% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPuget Workstation Threadripper TRX50 T120-L  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte TRX50 AERO D
Memory112.9 GB free of 128 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 03:36
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 32-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 204
2-Core 394
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 746
8-Core 1,497
132% 1,122 Pts
64-Core 7,104
440% 7,104 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
Nvidia(10DE 18CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
289% Outstanding
Lighting 440
Reflection 424
Parallax 492
358% 452 fps
MRender 498
Gravity 372
Splatting 246
290% 372 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 289%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK51.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,440
Write 3275
Mixed 2,747
634% 2,821 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 78.6
254% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,856
DQ Write 1,315
DQ Mixed 1,738
1,256% 1,636 MB/s
Poor: 239% Great: 591%
Kingston SKC3000D4096G 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,566
Write 4,339
Mixed 3,181
759% 3,362 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 93.6
297% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,932
DQ Write 1,435
DQ Mixed 1,707
1,270% 1,691 MB/s
Poor: 244% Great: 640%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965791-046.A00G 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
367% Outstanding
MC Read 170
MC Write 130
MC Mixed 149
428% 150 GB/s
SC Read 40.5
SC Write 75.7
SC Mixed 54.3
162% 56.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 334%
This bench: 367%
Great: 444%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 24" 1920 1009 AUS24A4 MG248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback