HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230925
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 02:41
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
67% 131 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 598
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8592) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9
Parallax 8
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 1176 1147 928 949 954 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 905
Write 617
Mixed 732
SusWrite 1,047
186% 825 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 15.1
57% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 326
228% 289 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 130%
Great: 352%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
419GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 600 588 523 531 535 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 380
Write 363
Mixed 380
SusWrite 561
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 22.4
71% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 174
126% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 139 142 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 82.7
Write 134
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 137
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 138 137 135 137 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 132
Write 142
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 137
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 6.3
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 149 113 60 23.8" 1280 720 XMID001 A24FAA-RG
Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback