Alienware m18 R1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlienware m18 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0KMHVK
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 20:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 209
2-Core 397
115% 224 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 854
73% 627 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0C49) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 532.09
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 298
Reflection 337
Parallax 326
243% 320 fps
MRender 431
Gravity 268
Splatting 217
239% 305 fps
Poor: 142%
This bench: 214%
Great: 244%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
7.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,015
Write 5,101
Mixed 2,656
739% 3,257 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 84.9
251% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,463
DQ Write 1,218
DQ Mixed 1,366
1,016% 1,349 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 702%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG88AGBSA092N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
164% Outstanding
MC Read 69.4
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 57.8
183% 64.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 32.6
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 18 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3198 HP 27xw
Typical m18 R1 Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 281%
UFO

System: Alienware m18 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback