Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 230%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics230% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 17:13
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 292
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,128
101% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$600
Gigabyte(1458 413B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Lighting 324
Reflection 333
Parallax 396
264% 351 fps
MRender 490
Gravity 280
Splatting 225
259% 332 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 230%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1337 1613 2051 2090 1138 559 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,596
Write 2,210
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 1,464
406% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 84.6
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,125
DQ Mixed 1,371
1,031% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 305%
Great: 323%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
477GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1771 1849 1842 1837 760 519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,633
Write 1,925
Mixed 128
SusWrite 1,430
338% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 80.3
272% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 737
DQ Write 1,312
DQ Mixed 468
512% 839 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 323%
Great: 311%
WD WD42EJRX-89BFNY0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 144 164 166 164 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 35
Write 134
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 156
69% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 166 185 187 187 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 133
Mixed 81
SusWrite 177
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA80-32A160U 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 28
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 30.2
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23" 1280 720 ACR02CD P238HL
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $897
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback