Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory117.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 09:12
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 828
73% 621 Pts
64-Core 4154
257% 4154 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 83.3
Reflection 98
Parallax 174
68% 118 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 113
Splatting 140
104% 125 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 4.8 50 53 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,419
Write 920
Mixed 906
SusWrite 164
189% 852 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.8
212% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 224
241% 392 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 154%
Great: 242%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
89GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,523
Write 1,941
Mixed 1,511
441% 1,992 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 72.9
238% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 755
DQ Mixed 519
491% 774 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Kingston SHFR200480G 480GB
120GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 173 150 136 118 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 484
Write 426
Mixed 377
SusWrite 185
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 32.6
110% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 200
172% 254 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 103%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$60
146GB free
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 420 417 426 425 425 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 436
Mixed 405
SusWrite 424
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 38.6
124% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 124
140% 239 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 127%
Kingston HyperX 3K 480GB-$256
167GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 235 232 222 222 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 35.6
Write 312
Mixed 121
SusWrite 228
40% 174 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 11.5
64% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 146
104% 132 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%
Samsung MZ7LM960HMJP-000MV 960GB
249GB free
Firmware: GXT51M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 457 457 457 457 458 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 462
Mixed 356
SusWrite 457
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 33.9
112% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 292
220% 295 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 299 297 295 296 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 473
Mixed 410
SusWrite 316
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 41.1
133% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 294
221% 296 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 124%
WD Gold 8TB (128MB Cache 2016)-$103
6TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 183 188 196 185 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 185
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 188
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
191% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback