Asus GL502VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL502VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VT
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '24 at 06:52
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 143
50% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 505
46% 389 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.5
5% 4.73 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.7
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,814
Write 831
Mixed 526
230% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 50
189% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 719
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 363
296% 435 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
75GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 420 419 415 422 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 429
Mixed 377
SusWrite 416
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 50.7
166% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 323
246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15D2
Typical GL502VT Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL502VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback