Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 21:19
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 85.5
1-Core 179
2-Core 354
109% 206 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,338
121% 1,016 Pts
64-Core 2,318
143% 2,318 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 209
Parallax 223
192% 222 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 160
Splatting 132
141% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S660 1TB
747GB free
Firmware: SN14081
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2511 2487 2481 2513 2365 1338 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,561
Write 2,561
Mixed 2,057
SusWrite 2,282
533% 2,365 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 86.7
299% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,616
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,331
1,019% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 397%
Great: 502%
XF-512 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0629479F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1685 256 288 274 246 232 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,490
Write 2,398
Mixed 1753
SusWrite 497
398% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 77.5
265% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 1,131
802% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 254%
Great: 342%
Gigastone SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 27 57 5.4 63 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 492
Write 189
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 39.1
40% 187 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 57.7
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 0.7
23% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 98%
Gigastone SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 432 434 434 440 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 448
Mixed 408
SusWrite 436
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 22.6
150% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 82.6
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 29.3
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 204 196 189 190 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 39.2
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 7G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 20% 30 194 13 165 31.5" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI AG32CV
History: Score 16: 0P 2R 1G 3B | Score 50: 0P 4R 6G 12B | Score 57: 0P 5R 7G 11B
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $928
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback