MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 214%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 07:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,319
117% 992 Pts
64-Core 3,018
187% 3,018 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 286
Parallax 212
202% 249 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 159
Splatting 142
138% 174 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 164%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1418 647 237 214 204 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1679
Write 1,621
Mixed 1,580
SusWrite 484
301% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 86.5
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 757
568% 755 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 221%
Great: 295%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
904GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 490 493 493 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 494
Mixed 444
SusWrite 491
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61.5
210% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 132%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 62
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 50.7
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 44.2
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 142%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 24.5" 1920 1080 BNQ7F83 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $915
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback