Lenovo 21DJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21DJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 10.4
2-Core 19.9
7% 15.1 Pts
4-Core 29
8-Core 30.5
4% 29.8 Pts
64-Core 28.2
2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 32% Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3E7B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.6
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt512g LS KIOXIA 512GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 443 400 337 630 956 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 25.1
Mixed 247
SusWrite 531
62% 268 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 43.1
132% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 125
95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.02% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 4.5
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 2.2
4% 1.3 GB/s
Latency 3,019
1% 3,019 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 12 60 15.5" 1536 864 LEN9052
Typical 21DJ Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 21DJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback