Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 252%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 329%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 22:35
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 216
2-Core 425
124% 241 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,663
149% 1,259 Pts
64-Core 3,793
235% 3,793 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 290
Parallax 357
259% 321 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 262
Splatting 193
214% 273 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 215%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3389 3359 3343 3337 3337 3337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
510% Outstanding
Read 2859
Write 3,369
Mixed 3139
SusWrite 3,350
720% 3,179 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 107
375% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,898
DQ Write 1,478
DQ Mixed 1,651
1,245% 1,676 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 510%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
660GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3048 1847 1846 1864 1854 1848 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2,871
Write 2487
Mixed 3,104
SusWrite 2,051
592% 2,628 MB/s
4K Read 77.4
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 104
373% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,788
DQ Write 1,383
DQ Mixed 1,549
1,169% 1,574 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 425%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3278 3283 3281 3278 3278 3284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,759
Write 3,298
Mixed 3,074
SusWrite 3,280
703% 3,103 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 94.4
310% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,891
DQ Write 1,496
DQ Mixed 1666
1,254% 1,684 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 482%
Great: 526%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 178 178 184 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 120
Write 166
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 178
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SB-DR5U-16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 66.8
MC Write 51.6
MC Mixed 53.2
163% 57.2 GB/s
SC Read 48.2
SC Write 55.2
SC Mixed 52.1
148% 51.8 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 157%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 DEL200B D3218HN
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $2,173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback