Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 20:08
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 191
2-Core 371
118% 220 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,254
120% 989 Pts
64-Core 1,793
111% 1,793 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 14.3
6% 12.7 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.6
14% 15.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Dell(1028 3891) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 246
Parallax 290
240% 276 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 231
Splatting 166
193% 248 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3611 1524 1340 1343 1321 1358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,706
Write 3,824
Mixed 2,900
SusWrite 1,750
632% 2,795 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 74.5
247% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,583
DQ Write 1008
DQ Mixed 1,398
1,015% 1,330 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 349%
Great: 592%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
744GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2077 2088 2012 1958 1110 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 2,175
Mixed 1,802
SusWrite 1,613
407% 1,795 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 58.2
191% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,372
1,025% 1,367 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 282%
Great: 365%
Pc611 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
149GB free
Firmware: 11001111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 408 406 413 394 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,104
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 469
248% 1,100 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 60.7
200% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 1,312
DQ Mixed 1,020
795% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 184%
Great: 213%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 1003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 191 189 190 189 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6000 C30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 74.6
MC Mixed 72.4
197% 68.9 GB/s
SC Read 57.1
SC Write 73.8
SC Mixed 66.1
188% 65.7 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 192%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 120 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F34 BenQ RL2460H
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,019
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback