Microsoft Surface Pro 8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 8  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 8
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 12:20
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 193
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 575
49% 421 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Microsoft(1414 0046) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 23.7
17% 23 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN770M 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,648
Write 1,891
Mixed 1,770
466% 2,103 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 63.5
207% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 589
423% 558 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 38.1
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 16.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 13" 1280 720 LGD06B1
Typical Surface Pro 8 Builds (Compare 2,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback