HP h8-1559

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP h8-1559 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 2AC8
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120911
Uptime	24.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 125 57% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 405 39% 320 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 33.9 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 44.4 28% 37.7 fps	MRender 45.4 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 34.4 33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 16 25 129 16 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 220 Write 96.1 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 89.2 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 9.2 40% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 21.1 DQ Mixed 19.7 14% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 382GB free Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 118 Write 111 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 98.5 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB 4,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.7% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM065D SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1559 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1559

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	11x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	1x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Force LS 120GBCorsair $98Bench 54%, 9,315 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 2,689 samples	3x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 6,798 samples	2x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16