Lenovo 10M2S09W00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10M2S09W00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30FD
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170719
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 19:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8570E R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 31.5
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 73.2
26% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 77.6
9% 71.8 Pts
64-Core 76.6
5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30FD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5
Parallax 6
3% 5.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 866 1377 1095 1749 939 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 768
Write 406
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 1183
203% 896 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 190
146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 157%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 321
12% 321 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2412 GP01
Typical 10M2S09W00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10M2S09W00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback