Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 18:37
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$164
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 257
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 608
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 73%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$246
CLim: 2167 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 149
Parallax 108
95% 124 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 110
Splatting 94.5
93% 117 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,299
Write 766
Mixed 604
196% 890 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48
181% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 391
304% 427 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
491GB free
Firmware: HP51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 181
Write 149
Mixed 88.9
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
15GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 9.9
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 41% 27 216 59 72 27" 1920 1057 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback