MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 346
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 88.6
Parallax 53.3
50% 67.5 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 63.7
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 285 271 251 248 233 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 292
Write 420
Mixed 231
SusWrite 266
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 39.5
135% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 53.8
50% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 93%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
580GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 238 28 29 287 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 428
Write 397
Mixed 348
SusWrite 154
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 20
97% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 23.3
29% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
358GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 157 161 161 162 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 140
Write 134
Mixed 75
SusWrite 158
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
49GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 142 144 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 170
Write 155
Mixed 105
SusWrite 143
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8C-RD Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 HMT41GU7BFR8C-RD Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 24GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 68: 8R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
68% 54% 41 293 216 60 24.1" 1920 1200 HWP309E HP Z24i
History: Score 26: 4R 0G 6B | Score 60: 7R 8G 1B | Score 61: 7R 7G 5B | Score 68: 8R 7G 7B
Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback