HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8390
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 18:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 71.7
44% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 134
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 50.5
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 53.8
41% 55.2 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 55.8
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 936 891 342 346 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 977
Mixed 905
SusWrite 586
216% 968 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 43.2
139% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 292
213% 281 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 148%
Great: 193%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 121 121 119 114 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 114
65% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MHF-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 9.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 3R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 14% 97 191 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUO42ED
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback