Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 12:18
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 645
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 128
Parallax 125
102% 126 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 115
Splatting 97.9
93% 117 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 1188 1507 1562 1423 1607 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1870
Write 1816
Mixed 1,773
SusWrite 1,406
386% 1,716 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 54.1
175% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 507
DQ Mixed 638
475% 636 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 244%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
269GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 255 81 81 80 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 438
Write 423
Mixed 353
SusWrite 156
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 33.5
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 121%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 140 140 138 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 177
Write 166
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 140
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.9
13% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
595GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 57 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 58.2
Mixed 41
SusWrite 57.4
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2800 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 13.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 AUS27E0 ASUS VG27W
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback