Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 09:23
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 222
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 665
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 144
Parallax 141
115% 142 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 131
Splatting 114
108% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1885 1859 1720 1497 1518 1662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,120
Write 2,168
Mixed 2,034
SusWrite 1,690
451% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 64.2
206% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 729
541% 721 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 284%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
238GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 209 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 481
Write 441
Mixed 397
SusWrite 163
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 38.3
130% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 366
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 121%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 139 141 139 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 176
Write 158
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 141
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 0.9
19% 6.73 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
595GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 54 57 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 63
Write 54
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 56.9
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2800 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 2560 1377 AUS27E0 ASUS VG27W
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback