Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JA
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210611
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '24 at 11:21
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	KEN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 180 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 195 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.03 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 7 Splatting 9.5 6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 256GB 599 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11099 SusWrite @10s intervals: 910 1102 560 278 287 260 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	188% Outstanding	Read 1,698 Write 1,143 Mixed 1,057 SusWrite 566 248% 1,116 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 62.4 216% 77.7 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 498 DQ Mixed 463 337% 432 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 188% Great: 254%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 232GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 85 84 85 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 134 Write 127 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 85 73% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 224% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 0BF7 DDR-C300 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.5% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 16.9 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	308x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	210x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	36x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	518x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	36x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	72x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	47x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	29x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	179x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	118x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16