Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 10:09
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 97
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 834
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 1040
64% 1040 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 97
Parallax 59.5
58% 75.8 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 71.6
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ardor GAMING m.2 NVME 512Gb AL1284 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H230306a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1952 1865 1699 585 573 571 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1481
Write 1,983
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1,208
347% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.1
210% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 622
499% 709 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 232%
Great: 305%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
32GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 148 127 51 80 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 485
Write 408
Mixed 347
SusWrite 124
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 30.5
130% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 171
149% 225 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
168GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 110 113 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 102
Write 119
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 112
67% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 26.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 23.8" 1280 720 IVM6128 X2483/2481
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback