Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 23:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 159
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 485
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.5
3% 6.7 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.2
6% 7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 113 54 98 102 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 909
Write 936
Mixed 869
SusWrite 92.3
157% 702 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 54.9
189% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 398
289% 371 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 117%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.5" 1280 720 VSC36AF VX2458 Series
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback